Scientific dating methods in archaeology mitrik dating single

24-Apr-2019 14:18

They went to Egypt and launched an intensive on-site investigation.

After thoroughly studying the Sphinx first hand, the geologist came to share West's preliminary conclusion and they announced their findings.

You do not get to number two unless you have number one.

Science is a method that anyone can learn and apply.

Shifting the focus away from the issues and "personalizing" the debate --one which is often used by politicians who feel insecure about their positions.

Hawass and Lehner invoked their untouchable status and presumed authority.

The controversy over how the Great Pyramid was constructed is one example.

It could be easily settled if Egyptologists wanted to resolve the dispute.

Two filters keep the uncredentialled, independent researcher out of the loop: (1) credentials, and (2) peer review.

was at least twice as old (9,000 years) as Egyptologists claimed.

It has become well known as the "water erosion controversy".

A simple test could be designed and arranged by impartial engineers that would either prove or disprove their longstanding disputed theory--that it was built using the primitive tools and methods of the day, circa 2500 BC. The answer is so obvious, it seems impossible: they know that the theory is bogus.

Could a trained, highly educated scientist really believe that 2.3 million tons of stone, some blocks weighing 70 tons, could have been transported and lifted by primitive methods?

Two filters keep the uncredentialled, independent researcher out of the loop: (1) credentials, and (2) peer review.was at least twice as old (9,000 years) as Egyptologists claimed.It has become well known as the "water erosion controversy".A simple test could be designed and arranged by impartial engineers that would either prove or disprove their longstanding disputed theory--that it was built using the primitive tools and methods of the day, circa 2500 BC. The answer is so obvious, it seems impossible: they know that the theory is bogus.Could a trained, highly educated scientist really believe that 2.3 million tons of stone, some blocks weighing 70 tons, could have been transported and lifted by primitive methods?An examination of the politicking that Egyptologists deployed to combat this undermining of their turf is instructive.